Well, That Got Their Attention
Today the Junior High kids and I jumped into online research for their class sustainability project. Last year (my first) things didn’t go so well online. Today was so much better, I hope we can keep it up.
I needed to convince them to pay attention to their sources. So before unleashing them on the internet, I told them about the bogus, hateful martinlutherking dot org. (link to ALA description) It’s the first non-sponsored hit on Google, sadly, but that fact certainly helped me get my point across. They were shocked.
When I discussed with them the list of questions I wanted them to answer, they embraced the idea quickly, and really gave it a good try. Here are the questions I asked them to try and answer.
- Who is the Author or Authoring Organization?
- Do you recognize them as an authoritative source?
Do another search if you need to. - If you’re just using one part of the web site - what is the Home Page?
- What is the date written? (if available)
- Is there an “About” section? Or a Mission Statement?
- Contact Details - is there a physical address? An email address?
I explained that not being able to answer these questions didn’t necessarily mean they should avoid the site, but that they should talk to me and together we’d investigate further. Just these few questions got them to slow down and be much more guarded about what they were reading. It went really, very well.
BTW - that site is surely the first hit on Google because of its popularity as a teaching tool among librarians. It would be great if we all could stop linking to it from web pages. The more links, the better the ranking. It’s gross that we’re helping keep it on top.
Congratulations on making such drastic improvements in the thoughtfulness of the process this time around. It sounds as though you managed to get them thinking about all of the right things. You might want to check out Kathy Schrock’s web site at http://school.discovery.com/schrockguide/. Under “Teacher Helpers” there is a section called “Critical Evaluation Tools.” I t includes a host of checklists, rubrics, articles, et cetera, all about analyzing web sites and teaching the analysis of web sites.
The most fun is “Sites to Use for Demonstrating Critical Evaluation,” which is a charming array of bogus web sites. My personal favorites are the ones about beautiful Mankato, MN (especially #21, the letter from Maureen Gustafson), the Burmese Mountain dog, and the Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus.
04 Oct 2006 at 12:03 pm
Pam,
I can see you are a dedicated teacher. The MLK site rally burns me but is a good teaching tool.
07 Oct 2006 at 6:07 pm
Darn it, Kate. I missed my chance to use the The Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus site.
http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/
08 Oct 2006 at 7:14 pm